Page 5 - GB-4000 Brochure www.QuantumBalancing.com
P. 5
When the first original machine was devel- today claim that their instruments have “the larg-
oped back in the early 1920s it had an output of 8 est effective range of any plasma device” on the
to 10 watts. By the late 1920s, the power output market. They make this claim because they have
was increased to 50 watts. This 50-watt output noticed effects over a 30-foot radius from their
was then considered the minimum power level plasma tube. They incorrectly attribute this 30-
needed for any machine which used a plasma foot distance to “Resonant Capacitive Coupling”
tube. The next machine built in 1935 was in- due to their use of a 27 million Hertz RF “carrier”
creased to 500 watts output, but when the fifth frequency. These claims are easily proven incor-
machine was built in 1936 the power output was rect because the original 1936 machine used a
reduced back to 75 watts. “carrier” frequency in the 3 million Hertz range
The 1936 number 5 machine was the only in- and it had the same effect at a 30-foot radius.
strument that was ever sold or used by the pub- Because the original 1936 number 5 machine
lic. It was sold in 1938 and 1939 by the Beam documents clearly verify this 30 foot or greater
Ray Corporation. The 1950s model was an up- radius range then this proves these claims are
dated 1936 model which was limited to a 50-watt nothing more than just sales hype.
output, but it was capable of much greater power The GB-4000 and M.O.P.A. have a variable
output. The plasma tube was always used within power output from 20 watts to a maximum power
a few inches to 24 inches of the targeted area for output of 190 watts. This makes it so our power
maximum power absorption. But when the origi- output is variable and the user can choose the
nal 1936 machine was tested with its 75-watt out- power level they would like to use.
put it had a range of well over a 30-foot radius. We have a frequency range from 1 Hertz to
This fact is known because the 1936 machine, 20 million Hertz with all of our instruments. This
when tested, wiped out every specimen in the change was made May 1, 2015, but many of our
laboratory. This laboratory was over 50 feet long. competitors, even after 3½ years, are still using
Also, the laboratory instructions for the machines our old M.O.P.A. plasma tube specifications of
stated that all control specimens needed to be only 40,000 Hertz in their comparisons. It ap-
kept at least 80 feet from the plasma ray tube so pears they are doing this because it is hard to
they would not be affected by the frequencies. compete with our current 20 million Hertz fre-
We point out this fact because some companies quency range capability.
www.QuantumBalancing.com 5
