Page 5 - GB-4000 Brochure
P. 5

When the first original machine was devel-           today claim that their instruments have “the larg-

        oped back in the early 1920s it had an output of 8      est effective range of any plasma device” on the
        to 10 watts. By the late 1920s, the power output        market. They make this claim because they have

        was increased to 50 watts. This 50-watt output          noticed effects over a 30-foot radius from their
        was then considered the minimum power level             plasma tube. They incorrectly attribute this 30-
        needed for any machine which used a plasma              foot distance to “Resonant Capacitive Coupling”

        tube. The next machine built in 1935 was in-            due to their use of a 27 million Hertz RF “carrier”
        creased to 500 watts output, but when the fifth         frequency. These claims are easily proven incor-

        machine was built in 1936 the power output was          rect because the original 1936 machine used a
        reduced back to 75 watts.                               “carrier” frequency in the 3 million Hertz range

           The 1936 number 5 machine was the only in-           and it had the same effect at a 30-foot radius.
        strument that was ever sold or used by the pub-         Because the original 1936 number 5 machine

        lic. It was sold in 1938 and 1939 by the Beam           documents clearly verify this 30 foot or greater
        Ray Corporation. The 1950s model was an up-             radius range then this proves these claims are
        dated 1936 model which was limited to a 50-watt         nothing more than just sales hype.

        output, but it was capable of much greater power            The GB-4000 and M.O.P.A. have a variable
        output. The plasma tube was always used within          power output from 20 watts to a maximum power

        a few inches to 24 inches of the targeted area for      output of 190 watts. This makes it so our power
        maximum power absorption. But when the origi-           output is variable and the user can choose the
        nal 1936 machine was tested with its 75-watt out-       power level they would like to use.

        put it had a range of well over a 30-foot radius.           We have a frequency range from 1 Hertz to
        This fact is known because the 1936 machine,            20 million Hertz with all of our instruments. This

        when tested, wiped out every specimen in the            change was made May 1, 2015, but many of our
        laboratory. This laboratory was over 50 feet long.      competitors, even after 3½ years, are still using
        Also, the laboratory instructions for the machines      our old M.O.P.A. plasma tube specifications of

        stated that all control specimens needed to be          only 40,000 Hertz in their comparisons. It ap-
        kept at least 80 feet from the plasma ray tube so       pears they are doing this because it is hard to

        they would not be affected by the frequencies.          compete with our current 20 million Hertz fre-
        We point out this fact because some companies           quency range capability.                              5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10